E3 is like a game enthusiast's second Christmas. A week-long Christmas full of frustration and hope. The stars aligned and somehow the two conferences I was looking forward to the least started the week off, meaning that--hopefully--it can only get better from here.
EA
I care very little for EA Games. While they're far less offensive in their activities these days, far better than the miserable two years they deservedly won the esteemed Worst Company of the Year award, they're still churning out terrible reboots and killing studios just like in their heyday. That said, their E3 conference this year wasn't so bad.
I'll say up front that I have no love for sports. They're just not for me, although I'll quickly show my derision for the knuckle-draggers that think they're so clever using the term "sportsball." I get it, you're an ignorant moron. Good job broadcasting it to the world. I'll also say that my opinion on EA was soured even further particularly because of their FIFA line of games and, more specifically, the microtransaction "FIFA Points" implemented in the game. Earlier in the year my PSN account was hacked, and the hacker changed my email address to his own. If not for my genius intellect and quick thinking I'd have probably lost that account forever, but against all odds I got it back. A few months later that hack ended up getting my PSN account banned, and the ensuing chaos caused directly by that hack was one of the most frustrating experiences of my life. And it's all because EA and their scammy microtransactions. So when I see how proud they are of the story mode implemented in their latest FIFA game and all the money they're pouring into their yearly lineup of low-quality sports games, I think I'm deservedly a little bitter.
So naturally, about half of their E3 conference was sports. Sports that I just don't care about, so by extension at least half of this show was stupid. However, they did make a point to say Respawn gained a brain and Titanfall 2 will be shipping with an actual single-player campaign this time around. I haven't bought a Call of Duty game in a while, but as far as I can tell those games haven't had nearly the innovations in parkour mechanics that the original Titanfall brought. Oh yeah, and mechs. I love mechs and so should you. If they're actually going to put money into that single player campaign I'll eat that game up, but since it's EA I'm sure it'll be stupid.
Speaking of stupid, Battlefield 1 is a stupid title. Why not Battlefield 1919 or something? It fits more in line with Battlefield's past naming scheme and doesn't look dumb. Pass.
Mass Effect 3 was the closest I ever want to get to having a crap taken on my chest, and even then I can tell you I wanted the experience to end as soon as possible. Terrible partners, RPG elements all but stripped away, very little exploration, and the most contrived plot twist to crop up in modern science fiction since LOST made for a game that can eternally burn in a dumpster fire. However, something about Mass Effect Andromeda piqued my interest. The returning premise of humanity being the new species among alien life, a concept almost entirely thrown out with the second game, could make for an interesting conflict. Moreover, unexplored worlds and exploration featuring the series whipping boy, the Mako, convinced me that maybe Bioware isn't entirely dead. I mean, it's been dead since Dragon Age II, but maybe this will be a return to form. Doubt it, but I'm optimistic.
Star Wars, because of course. A sequel to Battlefront was announced before the first game had its DLC finished, and I would wager it'll end up being either an annual series or take turns with Battlefield for EA's premiere cash grab. But wait--Amy Hennig and Jade Raymond are both working on a third-person action game with Visceral? Teasing us with Mos Eisley, too? Guys, I don't want to make this statement too early but my eye is very keenly focused on this new game. I don't care at all about any of this other crap, just please let me see much more of Visceral's Star Wars. It's the most I've been hyped about the series since 1313 was unfairly canned.
Wrapping the show up, EA announced several games being the focus of a charity drive. That's cool, I'm sure it'll be very helpful to the charities involved considering EA's player base. Other than that, EA announced EA Originals, an Indie development platform that reeks of following a trend. I'd love to see EA throwing open its massive coffers to support independent development, but you'll excuse me if I'm reticent of their good will considering all the developers they've bought only to shut their doors when sales were low.
Overall the games shown gave me a little bit of hope for EA, but with all the sports and prior knowledge of their business practices I have to wonder how much they'll actually deliver.
Bethesda
Someone once told me Skyrim is the best Action RPG of all time, and I laughed at him so hard he turned into a tree. Like EA, I don't care for the direction Bethesda's flagship series are taking; I still haven't picked up Fallout 4 and I don't particularly care to, either. This isn't a review of Bethesda games, but I wanted to make it clear that I didn't come into this show with any interest in Elder Scrolls or Nu-Fallout.
While Dishonored 2 shows promise, I never cared to finish the original game. It seems interesting and much better than the new Thief game as a successor to that series--although that's still not saying much. Hearing that this game will come with a voucher for a digital copy of the original game perked me right up though, so I might just pick this one up if only to get a two-game experience out of it. If it's exclusive to the Collector's Edition, which I'm sure it probably is, then there goes my interest.
Prey is about what I expected from the reveal, if only for the fact that it's a reboot. The original Prey came out years ago and dropping a sequel to a sleeper hit like that seems like a bad idea, so merely rebooting it and retooling gameplay ideas from the canned sequel might just be the way to go. I like the premise and setting, but then I also liked the original game. However, we got no gameplay out of it unless you consider "cinematic" representations to be gameplay. I need to see more, but it has potential.
I don't care at all about Fallout, but I'm a bit disappointed in the direction for Quake: Champions. I was hoping for another glorious reboot like Wolfenstein and Doom, and if this turns out to simply be a hero-based arena shooter a la Team Fortress 2 or Overwatch then I just don't care. I also don't care about Elder Scrolls Online or its card game, and Skyrim Special Edition is the most obvious remaster in history. That said, I lost interest in the original release so I might pick this one up. It's just a prettier version of the game on PC with mod support, but that might be alright. So long as it's at a reasonable price, at least. Then again I got bored of it so quickly that I can see it happening this time around as well.
Finally, I'm disappointed that Doom had no Single Player content confirmed, but I'm glad they're opening Snapmap to be more like custom .wads from the original games. It'll give players plenty to do for some time in the future, so let us have it.
Overall, I went into Bethesda's conference with my hopes very low and came away with a bit of information that I didn't entirely hate. The remastered games are annoying, but Prey and Snapmap options are very welcome.
Stay tuned this week for my feelings on the rest of the conferences!
No comments:
Post a Comment